townhall-2Greetings everyone. I hope you all have had a blessed holiday season. I know that many have been very busy and the commentary here has reflected that. I tried to keep the Tuesday posts a little less divisive or controversial for this very reason. But this week I had determined to get a little more confrontational, but I am not.

It is a very personal reason that made me change my mind. This reason has a name and it is James Jr., (we call him JJ), and he is my two year old grandson that is staying with me and I must keep him while my wife is working. It is a joy but also a handful.

So let’s keep it simple once again.

Peeve as a noun is defined as ‘a source of annoyance or irritation’. And I am sure you have heard the expression ‘pet peeve’. This has the sense that there is something that irritates us and we focus in on it or make it our ‘pet’. So I want you to share with me your responses to the following this week.

Do you have any theological pet peeves?

Any preaching pet peeves?

Any biblical pet peeves?

Is there something being taught out there that just makes you fume, and why?

Have a great day and let me know what you think.

Love you all

Tags: , , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Tuesday, January 6th, 2009 at 12:17 am and is filed under Theology, Townhall Tuesday. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

24 comments so far

Doug
 1 

You are just trying to stir the pot…………..here goes.

I guess I have several but it all ties back to this. Ignorant preaching. I am by no means an authority on God’s word. IMO no one really is. The wisest men I have met dealing with God’s word are typically the most humble. That speaks volumes. I’m tired of irrelevance. We all know that God never changes……..we do, but having said that. We need to work within in the freedom that God has given us to minister and pull souls into the church by whatever means necessary. (By putting coffee houses in the atrium of the church) Jesus was radical for his time. Pentacostals were radical when they returned on the scene in the early 1900′s…..but something folks seem to forget this day and age is that by being radical they were NOT alienated from society. How can you win someone for Christ when all you show them is a list of don’ts and cant’s. I work with a lady who is some form of UPC and she totally isolates herself. Obviously they look different with the dresses all the time and long hair. (which is absolutely fine if that is what feel that God wants from you) But also no internet or TV. Now I know both are loaded with trash and we as Christians should shun the very apperance of evil………but IMO it all goes back to that message of self control that Jesus preached in everything. Look at the infamous 7 deadly sins. All of them deal with self control. I honestly believe that self control is what God wants out of us. If we control our hearts and we give it to God……….see where I’m going. Also the internet isn’t all bad…..this site is a prime example.

Another BIG peeve is the fact of hearing stories of the good ole’ days. God is right now!! I want to see miracles of the Smith Wigglesworth magnitude today. Also along the same lines is when people start making comments in regards to the old days there is always the statement of “I have seen people reach into a pot bellied stove and pull out hot coals while shouting”. I may offend someone, but bull-butter. First off what does God have to prove to you and me. Absolutely zilch. He is God. He has nothing to prove to anyone….but lets think about this for a second. What good comes from that and what does God gain by doing it? I have always heard the Holy Spirit is a gentleman. Why in this day and age of a New Testament church would our comforter need to prove himself to us in such a way…….or show out (if you prefer). I could see back in the early 1900′s when a pot bellied stove was the main source of heat and folks were shouting, bumping into a stove and not being burned. That makes perfect sense to me, but to openly reach into a stove and pull out hot coals and walk around. I just don’t know. I hate to hear those stories because it proves nothing to me and it doesn’t seem to go along with what God has shown me in my walk with him. I understand all through the bible we see where God does things out of the norm and takes a weakling like Gideon or David and makes him mighty, but it seems to me that there is a LOT of emotionalism within the church today and not a lot of substance. I want substance.

January 6th, 2009 at 8:26 am
 2 

Sometimes the pot must be stirred or things tend to separate and not blend for the desired result or stick to the bottom and become inedible…

Thanks Doug for the honesty and boldness in your stance. Possibly not surprising but I totally agree. That idea about self control is something we should all take to heart. It is a fruit of the spirit by the way. Separating ourselves from the world is not entering a monastery or practicing outward displays of religiosity that causes others to shun us. It is entering into the community of the lost and not getting their stain on us but instead showing them a beautiful Savior.

And going just a little further than you :twisted: I will say that some of those so called personal convictions, hair , dress and others, do nothing but cause either ridicule or ostracization and how is that enabling that person to reach others with the gospel. I also agree that the gospel and holiness itself is relevant and has to be practiced and presented as such.

Love you

January 6th, 2009 at 11:33 am
Tammy
 3 

This may sound somewhat general, and possibly off target, but here goes.
My pet peeves are a pastor who apologizes because he preaches past noon.
Who cares!!!! If you are saying what God told you to say, just say it and keep saying it until He says He is done!!!!
Song lyrics that do not line up, or scripture spelled incorrectly on Power Point!
Mostly, I realize how annoying it is when I hear a preacher speak on traditional beliefs rather than biblical truths!!
I have always been in a habit of “checking up” on the evangelist when things did not sound just right, but I still had that old traditional upbringing that sort of just passed everything down. We probably do not even know who’s interpretation we are passing down.
Thanks to my husband’s unique ability to challenge me and my reason for believing any given subject, I am being stretched on a regular basis, constantly growing and learning what is biblical truth in order to apply it to my life!!!
Thanks Babe for your obedience!
Love you

January 6th, 2009 at 2:22 pm
Connie
 4 

Last Sunday I went to lunch with a couple from church that were raised in the Pentecostal Church. They both have been members of COG or UPC for about 60 years. As I have only been in church for 15 years, they were telling me some of the “rules” of the “old days”. Some of (or most of) them were just down right ridiculous or even humorus. Of course there was the high hair, no make up and long dresses. But some that really stood out to me were these: (1) At one time members could not drink coca cola from a bottle, only from a glass. What that had to do with salvation I don’t have a clue. (2) They even told me of a man who voted against his own mother because she wore a pair of “WHITE” cotton stockings to church rather than the black ones. Yes, I said cotton…not nylon. (3) Men were not even allowed to wear necktimes at the time. There’s more, but I just can’t recall them all at the moment. We kinda got a kick out of our conversation. If those were still the standards today, I doubt very seriously if I would have stuck around very long in my present church.

I have found that in order for me to minister to someone who is lost or hurting, I have to find some way that they can relate to me. Just the same way that God had to come here as flesh so we could relate to Him. I don’t think I would be very effective if I went rushing in like a bull telling someone all the things they can’t do or can’t wear, etc. I can however, minister to them by telling them what they CAN do to find salvation, forgivness, hope and eternal life just by relating my own life’s experiences to their’s and how God brought me out.

As far as ignorant preaching goes; I cannot take back words spoken by another mouth. I PERSONALLY can’t allow myself to fume because it will fester and turn in to anger and resentment. I know my own limits. I do know that I can make sure that I plant a seed (The Truth) in one individual at at time. It may take longer than speaking to a multitude, but each ONE is worth the effort. As we all know, it is up to each individual which they choose to believe. All I can do is plant a seed and pray for rain.

I’m not even sure if I answered the questions you asked. But for today, these are the thoughts that I felt like sharing with all of you because you are my family and…

I Love You

January 6th, 2009 at 2:52 pm
 5 

No Connie, you didn’t. That is okay, I want all to share. But does that mean you have no pet peeves that are currently being done, said, practiced today?

Love you all

January 6th, 2009 at 3:16 pm
Tammy
 6 

Upon reading my previous post, I realized that I left out some things that ‘make me fume. ‘ Again, possibly not really on target with your question…

I am truly bothered when I see the generation coming up – taking on ministries, encouraged by our leadership when they cannot tell you who Esther is.
I was a substitute teacher for our college and career class a while back and was astounded at the lack of knowledge. Believe me, I struggle and do not retain as much as I would like, but the common bible stories that most elementary students can quote confused some of these students. The very ones who have been chosen by “church staff and new pastors” to be teachers and leaders in their church.
Do our children and teens not deserve better?

Secondly, what about the teens that are encouraged to stay in the youth group as leaders.
I have always disagreed with this decision. I believe that the students should be made to come out and be in a discipleship program for a minimum of one year before being allowed, much less asked to take leadership over the very kids they have been tormenting for the last 4 years or so.

I know this was not supposed to be a gripe session and I did not mean to turn it into one, but my goodness, we wonder why the ‘church’ is in the shape it is in…Take a look around!
No one holds the brother or sister accountable and very few see the significance of discipleship programs in the local church!
Maybe I am done this time. (I said maybe)
Love, mercy and grace!!!

January 6th, 2009 at 3:57 pm
Connie
 7 

Well okay then. Since we are pot stirring, let me find my biggest spoon! My biggest pet peeve is when a person gets all up in the middle of a ministry such as feeding the poor (whether it be a homeless ministry or a food bank) and the whole time they are “handing out the goods” they stand back a judge each and every person that reaches out for help. The whole purpose is to show the love of God by giving cheerfully and without all the griping because somebody might get one too many bites of grits or one extra can of pinto beans. It shouldn’t even matter how many more food banks they go to or how many times a day they go to a soup kitchen. If a person says he is hungry, FEED HIM! How they use it is between them and God.

Love You All

January 6th, 2009 at 4:37 pm
john
 8 

Tammy i agree with you that if the preacher has something to say then by all means take as long as needed. Sometimes i have noticed that all a preacher might have to say is said in the first ten minuites and then is refrased, turned around, and repeted over and over untill the cut off time has been reached. If the preacher should go past the cut off time shouldnt teachers do the same? My wonderfull wednesday night teacher is usuially quite punctual about getting through on time. Iknow he almost always has more he wants to get out,shouldnt he keep on going as long as he needs?

my pet peeve would be that i dislike singing one or two lines of a song 500 times in a row. if A song is good then lets sing the whole song. A good example would be Tammys song from Sunday. its a great song, she does a fantastic job with it. We could sing it untill she passes out and that would be o.k.–but it wouldnt be nearly as effective if we reduced it down to just a line or two.
I also think we have too many alter calls. I’m not against alter calls but if we end each service with one doesnt it become more of a service ender rather than a way of getting closer to God?

January 6th, 2009 at 4:56 pm
 9 

Esther? Who is that?

I guess that is one of my pet peeves… People in the church who think they know all the criteria for who should and should not be involved in ministry. We are all ministers, Tammy. If they know who Jesus is, then just encourage them and let them read about Esther in due course… Perhaps they were the only one willing to serve and deserve a little appriciation… but I’ll let it go for now.

My theological pet peeve is when something tragic happens and well-meaning people say something stupid like, “God did this for a reason,” when in all likelyhood God had nothing to do with it. This one line pushes multitudes away from what they perceive to be an uncaring and malicious God, instead of toward the God who loves them without restraint.

My preaching pet peeve is when a pastor says, “I had a sermon ready for this morning, but the Holy Spirit is telling me to preach about something else.” I always want to say, “Hey, next week, listen to the Holy Spirit while you are writing your sermon…” As an experienced preacher, I think this line can often be translated as “I am unprepared this morning and am going to pass it off in the most spiritual way I can think of.”

The only biblical pet peeve I can think of is the KJV only argument…

Something being taught that makes me fume is double-predestination Calvinism.

January 6th, 2009 at 6:45 pm
 10 

Thanks Doug, Connie, Tammy, John and Heath for your contributions. It is what I thought it would be. We all seem to mostly have problems with what we see happening in our own churches, which is understandable because we don’t see what goes on in others. Some of us do read or observe through other means some of the things going on outside our own but that seems to usually be pastors and teachers.

I have to agree with Tammy on the preaching issues and the PowerPoint spelling. I also know the situations she is talking about with teachers and youth pastors being set out to do the work of the Kingdom too early and without basic bible knowledge. It is sad and even dangerous for those they are teaching and pastoring really. The COG has been known for their lack of education and their total reliance on the Spirit and ‘moves of God’ and is finally coming out of that but we still want to perpetuate it in some ways.

And when teens should come out of the youth group is when they pass the age that the church has established for that and then they should get some adult teaching. Instead they are sometimes kept on in the capacity of ‘youth worker’ to just pad the numbers. Maybe not everywhere but we have seen it. Some do stay because they are needed because no one will step up, but are we really helping them?

And Connie makes a valid point about those that agree to serve but so they can make themselves feel superior in their judgmental attitudes. Or I guess that is what they are doing. She has firsthand knowledge. I say they should just stay at home but then would there be enough to do the work. I don’t know.

I just have to thank John, my friend, and say that I agree. “I’m not against altar calls but if we end each service with one doesn’t it become more of a service ender rather than a way of getting closer to God?” I quoted this because it is a great question to me.

And thanks Heath. I do value your opinion and will keep on but I have to say that some of us in the pew can see the dangers of not having criteria for ministry. The thoughts that led to what Tammy posting were as I said above. And I do know that there are situations and churches that just do not have the people they need. I used to say that if there was supposed to be a children’s teacher then God put someone there called to do that. I do not believe it anymore because I am maturing and see the problems with that view of Gods sovereignty. So I do believe you as a pastor have to work with what you have but I still have to ask if you believe this is the best for all involved or would it be better to double up classes under someone with some basic biblical foundations.

We do need to show appreciation for all who strive to do the work of the Kingdom and Tammy and I do. But there are some things that I just would not do if I was a pastor. I would not have let me teach after being saved only fifteen months from a life of atheism for 42 years. We have another lady that was asked to teach a child’s class years ago and was not even saved.

Are we only interested in numbers and babysitters or do we want to make disciples and soldiers for Christ?

I am totally in agreement with you about the stupid responses that we sometimes give when tragedy occurs. That is one reason I am becoming or have already become a believer in the open view of Gods sovereignty. It was underneath my constantly growing personal theological views but really started to solidify when my wife’s sister died and I caught myself saying some of those same stupid things and I just knew it was not the truth at that time.

And as far as the preaching, bible and Calvinism, all I can say is Amen.

Well, I probably should have saved this for a post but I’ll come up with something. And this is not a closed topic for all of those just now reading. Please continue to respond.

Love you all

January 7th, 2009 at 12:27 am
 11 

Theological – I guess one of these would be the idea that theology isn’t that important. The assumption is that theological reflection is optional or that really spiritual folk don’t partake in such things. I think that it’s important to note that everyone maintains some type of theological perspective.

Preaching – One of these would be “fillers,” whether it be asking the congregation to clap every few minutes or clichés that the preacher throws out there every few minutes or so (etc.). I have to be careful here, because it is really easy to develop communication habits which serve as fillers. And as someone who preaches, I know that I have my fair share that I need to get rid of. :)

Biblical – I guess this one pertains to biblical interpretation. When, in dialogue about a biblical issue, someone says, “I just believe what the bible says!” Well, I hope so. However, I think many would agree that oftentimes biblical interpretation involves a bit more than finding a scripture here and there and then coming to a conclusive position. What about issues that the bible does not speak about so clearly? Interpretation is a bit more dynamic.

Regarding something being taught that rather upsets me… One such topic regards women in ministry. Some contend that women can’t participate in ministry (or leadership). I disagree.

January 7th, 2009 at 1:14 am
 12 

Good to hear from you Shannon. Good peeves to ponder.

Love you

January 7th, 2009 at 1:24 am
Tammy
 13 

Thanks John, I actually removed my view on a minister adding to their altar call until all is heading to the alter. That is all I will say on that matter. As for the song, it is a fantastic song, but if we do it every week, it will lose something for most people

Heath, allow me to apologize for not clarifying my previous post. :oops:

To avoid hurting others and becoming the one mentioned in Luke 17:1, that brings the offense, I left out some key information. I am the first to support someone who is willing and feels led that they are called of God to serve in a ministry. Especially supportive if it is a ministry dealing with children and youth, however, my dislike is for the lack of wisdom I have been exposed to in my life and walk with God.

I have seen those very young people who have no knowledge of the word, placed in ministries before they themselves were taught. They only know that David slew the giant, or Noah built the ark, and for the most part they only know it as expressed in a children’s story format.

I see us losing ground with the upcoming generations and I am broken by it. I simply want those in leadership to know more than those they are teaching. I do not think they have to be highly educated; I strongly believe that the anointing and power of God can bring the knowledge and wisdom necessary. Sonny is a prime example of that! I would just like to see the evidence that God’s wisdom and knowledge are being craved before their ministering skills, or lack there of, create another generation with less wisdom and knowledge and more excuses. They need to be able to share what they believe and why they believe it. Most unbelievers will not simply accept “because the bible says.”

My husband says I try too hard to make my side known, especially if I feel like someone has the wrong idea. ;) I am trying to avoid sounding defensive in any way. I just wanted to explain that I am humbled and should not have been so general. Thanks for reminding me that I should be very careful with my words, especially striving to avoid sounding like complaints and or attacks.

I should have realized that I was speaking only through my personal experiences and that may not be the case in other churches. :idea:

What would be the criteria for placing someone over the children in your church?

Do you have specifics that you look for or do they come to you?

What is the determining factor that seals the deal with your teachers, etc?

:lovetransforms: :lovetransforms: :lovetransforms:

January 7th, 2009 at 11:02 am
Doug
 14 

Good questions Tammy!!

I loved Sonny’s statement about relying on the “Spirit”. That is what we as pentacostals have done for far too long. If you look at some of the best or most annointed ministers within the COG they are educated. That does not mean you have to have PhD to stand behind the pulpit, but it does help. Todays society has the world literally at their fingertips with this contraption I am typing on right now. The men and women standing behind our pulpits need to be equipped to teach/preach to their respective congregation and be relevant to the people they are ministering to. Preaching about high hair and women wearing pants has got jack to do with MY generation, much less teenagers that are coming up this day and age. It reminds me of some the things Sonny always talked about how he loved to argue/debate Christians about their beliefs in God……..and how they were almost always so ill prepared. We need more aplogetics taught within our denomination. Folks have no idea what we believe or why……they chalk it up to faith, but how is that going to win over an athiest who has been one for 42 years?

When it comes to teaching and leadership roles within the organization, I feel just like you guys do especially on the youth front. You come out for a minimum of 1 year and have to go through a discipleship program before you can go back in and “help”. I know all of this sounds great and wonderful, but it takes work and effort and I’m not seeing folks willing to put forth the type of effort to see something like this through. When Pam and I got to ACOG we were asked to be teachers within our first 6 months at the church. 8O While trying to breakdown age groups and classes to meet everyone’s needs is a great idea in theory……in small churches it is next to impossible. Teaching is a calling. Sonny is called to teach and it shows. He has passion for it and it comes out in his lessons. I think all to often in churches like ours that you have a class and if a teacher moves or steps down, that the powers that be often feel like the class HAS to continue on. If at all possible then yes…….but do not put someone in there just to have a teacher for a class. If you are having difficulty filling a spot then merge classes together and put them under someone that is called/anointed to do so. I remember that for about a year and a half we had no one to teach the boys on Wed night????? Put the boys and girls together and allow someone called to teach have at it. These type issues is where I’m talking about making tough decisions and seeing them through.

Rather than having a bunch of small insignificant classes. Merge together and have larger significant classes. It is sort of like my arguement for no Sunday night services. Our Sunday night services have dwindled down to being pretty insignificant. Folks show up and go through the motions. Why not extend the morning worship and not worry about what time we get out of service because we won’t have to come back that night to go through the motions. I’m preaching quality time with God as opposed to quantity time. I know arguements can be made for the traditional Sun night service, but the numbers don’t lie.

January 7th, 2009 at 12:40 pm
TILLER
 15 

Peeves-

=One of my biggest pet peeves would go along with some of the comments listed above.
I think that we have too few people do the majority of the work in the church. People don’t mind attending an event or putting their name on something done in the church. It has been my experience we can get a lot of people to start something, it’s the finishing something that we fall short on. We have a lot of half finished projects.

-Another would go along with one previously mentioned. I have noticed that we will sing a song way to many times in my opinion. I would extend that we sing songs way to often. If you have any old song sheets see if they are different from sheets from years ago.

To add to my first peeve, I am not sure things are done to the level of excellence that God expects from us.

-I agree with the youth coming out for a year. I would challenge you with this. I don’t remember a place for this age group to go. There have been classes started but no “transition” class has come to last more than a few months. We lose more people at this age group than any other during this transition phase. I believe the church fails in this area. I don’t have any answer. I also agree with combining classes if we are lacking in teachers.

January 7th, 2009 at 9:00 pm
 16 

Welcome Joel (unless this is a welcome to Brandy)

Sorry about the delay in moderation. I was at church and just got to this. Now that you have posted and are approved that shouldn’t need to be done again unless you use another computer at a different IP.

I agree to an extent about the song issue. But I do think it is okay to wear it out as long as God seems to be ministering through one. I know we all have our favorites though and not everyone likes what we like.

Laura’s class is supposed to be the one for those kids and those up to about 25 years old. When my class was originally started by Allen Wright it was supposed to be for 19 to 35 year olds. There just was not enough of these to split them up. But it sort of grew into mostly 40 to 55 with a few younger ones. The very ones we are talking about, the ‘kids’ made some noise about how they did not feel comfortable in my class with their parents.

It was then split into three. 18 to 25 in what is now Lauras (then it was Tony when he was there), Jaton (and I know that is probably not how her name is spelled-sorry) had the 26 to 40 ages and I kept the 41 to 55 age group.

I wanted to teach the 26 to 40, and Pastor gave me my choice, but in my analysis all that might come at that time were, as you already made a statement about, doing all the work. I would be teaching no one. So I made the choice I did to actually teach somebody that would come.

Well it immediately turned into Tony not having any of the young ones hardly show up still and Jaton teaching some of the homeless. My core has stayed about the same. Now Jaton is gone and some of you go to Laura’s and if you didn’t she would have no one. It is actually your age that has no class anymore. But we do not have hardly anyone coming in the ages Laura is supposed to be teaching.

To sum up my thoughts, we should only have at the most two classes at this time, due to the actual demographics of attendees and it could be only one if the different ages really felt comfortable with each other. A smaller church, with even less attending classes, just cannot break up into all the age groups a larger one can.

I used to want a lot of people so all of this has disappointed me in the past. I don’t anymore. I want any age person that is serious about their relationship with God and not afraid to test all things and see if what we are doing is for the betterment of the Kingdom.

You may have known all of this and if you did I am sorry but I just got started and it came rolling out. I have no real answers for some of these things that have been brought up but I do know it starts with individuals that have a hunger for God.

Love you

January 8th, 2009 at 1:57 am
Tammy
 17 

Tiller, while I have always agreed that 20% of the church do 80% of the work in our local church, I do not see that changing for us until we figure out how to get and keep more able bodies.

I know that the excuse has always been there that we have no place for the 20ish group, but with my experience it seems that the past 3 or 4 youth pastors we had consistently encouraged that age group to stay up there to help, hang out or what ever.

I know there are true workers like you guys and the Finchers who work behind the scenes in every thing and every way you can, but for the most part that was not the case. There has been more than one class started for this age group (at their request) that did not succed due to lack of interest, attendance, etc. I have heard several of their reasons but I think the truth is they are being pulled into other things, their independence is growing and it just gets easier and easier to miss Sunday School and then church altogether. I have a burden for those we are losing. I wish I could lend them the strength they need until they realize the strength that God has inside them.

Doug, I agree that with the technology alone advancing the way it is, we need to be prepared to challenge, teach and mentor the next generations. I was raised in church but I did not grow until I was challenged to know who, what, when, where and why. (Still learning myself) That is on me! The fact remains that it is needed today more than ever.

I wish I knew what the answer is to the Sunday night service, and I hesitate to give my opinion here. Let me just say that I agree with your post and with John’s statement about the altar.
I do not just agree, I am praying feverishly for direction.
I am also praying that the 20% does not grow weary, bitter or discouraged to the point of giving up.

These song issue seems to be trying to turn us into cheer leaders or something. Are we trying to work up the Spirit?

January 8th, 2009 at 10:24 am
Wayne
 18 

Man, this is getting good

It would be so easy if we have classes that fit neatly into the age groups, 18-25, maybe 26-40 and 41-55.

18-25 is a very important age. Mentors for this age group would help the transition from youth to adult. Mentors to help them in their study and fellowship.

What seems to be lacking, at least in my opinion, is the 25-40 age group. That age group is the “next generation” of church leadership. By leadership I mean teachers, ushers, pastor’s council and workers. In 5-10 years will we have anyone ready to fill those roles.

And to Doug’s point about Sunday night services. Why couldn’t we have issue driven bible studies? Make a list of some of the issues that we struggle with in everyday life and teach/learn from a biblical perspective. It would be more of a specific study.

January 8th, 2009 at 11:14 am
 19 

Ask me sometime about my church services models?

You guys are great. this conversation has some very good thoughts all around. Wayne is so right about the 25 to 40 age group. We are not attracting them or keeping them when they do show up. I know that to be fact in our church and for the most part it seems to be the same in so many of the smaller churches all around. If you are not a poster and are just reading, you are encouraged to get in on this discussion. I really would like to know if that is true about your churches.

And I think the age group idea is outdated to start with to a certain degree. Topical class division would be so much better but how could it be implemented in small churches with so few teachers and class attendees?

Love you all

January 8th, 2009 at 12:37 pm
Julie
 20 

I strongly agree that anyone wanting to teach should interview with the church and children’s pastor. Let’s face it folks, just because you seem like you have it together on Sunday morning and Wednesday night, doesn’t mean you should be teaching our kids.

It is very disappointing that our youth group is becoming extinct. These are the very ages when kids need the most shepherding in their lives. For some, a youth pastor takes the role of the absent mother or father. Most teens had rather talk to a friend or youth pastor about “sticky” subjects than with their parents.

ACOG is just not appealing to the 25 to 40 age range. The fellowship activities, Bible studies, and childrens’ programs cannot compete with the larger churches in the area. We have to start somewhere, I’m just not sure where.

IMO a church needs adequate attendance in all age groups. I have seen in other churches where the senior members serve as mentors to the young adults. I recently attended a bible study taught by a 70-ish year old and I loved it!

Sounds like we all desire some sort of change in this area of our church — what shall we do about it? :roll:

January 8th, 2009 at 10:20 pm
 21 

Julie,

Happy to see you here.

I think that this is a start. Very often change begins when people start a dialogue. When those who did not quite realize that others share the same opinions find out that they can discuss things with each other it is a beginning that can lead to change. But if we all just go to church, do what we can, and then go away not quite satisfied, we will never get anything done.

All of us that feel this way need to talk, get together, strategize. From this discussion alone we should all feel and see that we are not alone. ACOG has some problems for this age group we are talking about. I am not even in it but think more like it than the older group we do have. And since I wasted so many of these very years I feel strongly about your age group not making that same mistake.

I don’t have any concrete solutions at the moment and I don’t think any one or two of us can solve or change this. But if we become unified and continue this dialogue then we might figure out how we could start bringing about some changes.

I am going to put a question on the Forum at http://forum.sonnycable.com and any of you that would like to participate in a meeting to discuss these very things, please respond there and we can get something together.

This is not closed for discussion here though, so please continue to post.

Love you all

January 8th, 2009 at 10:52 pm
Tammy
 22 

Thanks again Sonny!
This post proves that we are not the only ones with these concerns.
It sounds like we may have more interested in attending a bible study and a fun night once a month if we get another one started.
Let’s pray about that!!!

January 9th, 2009 at 10:21 am
Nancy M
 23 

I am sure this may seem like a gripe session but you asked for it. When I first came to ACOG I was called aside and given a talking to about being faithful. I understand some lines were crossed because I was family but at least I understood what was expected of me. Too many times a person is asked to teach a class before they are ready. I was one of them. I was not saved at the time and I can assure you I didn’t know who Ester was. P.P. #1. I think before being put in a class to teach you should have been taught not just put there because you are good at handling the particular group. I enjoyed Sunday School even though the teacher I had at the time would always get to a particular story and perhaps to save time she would say “Well you know the story about….” so I won’t go into it. Well I didn’t know the basic stories–I didn’t even realize the Bible repeated itself in so many places. I stayed confused and I didn’t really know where to begin. So I would say P.P #2 is when someone called or at least someone who has acceped the position of teacher just asumes that everyone knows the basics. If you are a teacher then -TEACH- don’t asume everyone sitting in your class knows the story you have studied to do your lesson by. A speaker using the wrong word to make a point or tell a story or using a really big fancy word when a plain simple word would do just as well and people would even know what you meant–P.P. #3. A preacher, teacher or lay person that acts like you are stupid or are going to bust Hell wide open when you ask a question or have a different point of view–P.P.#4. I am glad that we have the opportunity to ask questions and make comments in our classes and even though we may not all agree all of the time we have a common ground-I appreciate the teachers I have had that have challenged me to study for myself, and I appreciate Sonny for upsetting my apple cart at times. Starting a project and not seeing it through to the end P.P.#5-The comment Connie made about people standing back and judging others upsets me too-but another aspect is when people sign on but the job that they want is standing around talking while everyone else is doing the labor. Reaching the lost is the reason for the project but if the project falls short of the best we can do then what does that say to those we are trying to reach. We should also remember that we should keep our conversation positive. We shouldn’t be talking about others or talking down to those we are supposed to be lifting up. As for the 20% that seems to do 80% of the work–P.P. #6. When we as a body embrace each other in love–not duty then hopefully the people in the body that feel that they have nothing to offer because they are not as talented, out going or bold as the person in charge of that dept. will join in and help pull the load.

As for Sunday night services. I enjoy gathering together. If we had a less formal setting that would be fine with me but for the ones that don’t come on Sun. night anyway why do you care if we have service or not?

January 12th, 2009 at 10:43 am
Nancy M
 24 

I am sure this may seem like a gripe session but you asked for it. When I first came to ACOG I was called aside and given a talking to about being faithful. I understand some lines were crossed because I was family but at least I understood what was expected of me. Too many times a person is asked to teach a class before they are ready. I was one of them. I was not saved at the time and I can assure you I didn’t know who Ester was. P.P. #1. I think before being put in a class to teach you should have been taught not just put there because you are good at handling the particular group. I enjoyed Sunday School even though the teacher I had at the time would always get to a particular story and perhaps to save time she would say “Well you know the story about….” so I won’t go into it. Well I didn’t know the basic stories–I didn’t even realize the Bible repeated itself in so many places. I stayed confused and I didn’t really know where to begin. So I would say P.P #2 is when someone called or at least someone who has acceped the position of teacher just asumes that everyone knows the basics. If you are a teacher then -TEACH- don’t asume everyone sitting in your class knows the story you have studied to do your lesson by. A speaker using the wrong word to make a point or tell a story or using a really big fancy word when a plain simple word would do just as well and people would even know what you meant–P.P. #3. A preacher, teacher or lay person that acts like you are stupid or are going to bust Hell wide open when you ask a question or have a different point of view–P.P.#4. I am glad that we have the opportunity to ask questions and make comments in our classes and even though we may not all agree all of the time we have a common ground-I appreciate the teachers I have had that have challenged me to study for myself, and I appreciate Sonny for upsetting my apple cart at times. Starting a project and not seeing it through to the end P.P.#5-The comment Connie made about people standing back and judging others upsets me too-but another aspect is when people sign on but the job that they want is standing around talking while everyone else is doing the labor. Reaching the lost is the reason for the project but if the project falls short of the best we can do then what does that say to those we are trying to reach. We should also remember that we should keep our conversation positive. We shouldn’t be talking about others or talking down to those we are supposed to be lifting up. As for the 20% that seems to do 80% of the work–P.P. #6. When we as a body embrace each other in love–not duty then hopefully the people in the body that feel that they have nothing to offer because they are not as talented, out going or bold as the person in charge of that dept. will join in and help pull the load.

As for Sunday night services. I enjoy gathering together. If we had a less formal setting that would be fine with me but for the ones that don’t come on Sun. night anyway why do you care if we have service or not?

Hope and Joy to everyone

January 12th, 2009 at 11:54 am

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

:) :D :lol: :P :twisted: :( :well: :o :cry: 8) 8O ;) :KISS: :oops: :RO: :| :x :roll: :arrow: :idea: :??: :!: :eat: :eyes: :$$: :wnk: :crzy: :burnup: :WOW: :pray: :mad?: :nunchk: :emb: :sry: :hlp: :zzz: :swt: :FIT: :bf6: :hrts: :luvu: :bf5: :nonono: :fite: :BH: :bf3: :clap: :hh: :laff: :bgeye: :fite2: :CSL: :SUN: :DNC: :NO: :mrgreen: :lovetransforms: :talk: :GT: :love U: :bf: :bf1: :HEAD: :sick: :bf2: :hdbng: more »