19
Jan

Naked Before God

   Posted by: Sonny   in America, Body of Christ, Eternity, Politics

And the man and his wife were both naked and were not ashamed. Genesis 2:25

When God first created Adam and Eve He did not furnish clothing to them.  There was no need.  They were made in the image of God and walked in relationship with Him that you and I just can’t comprehend.  They had been created as adult beings but were actually children in the eyes of God.  They were innocent and they were good.

One of the things the Fall brought about was the loss of innocence.  This was an innocence that not only allowed them to have a perfect relationship with God; they actually perceived no difference between themselves and God.  They did not even realize they were naked.

jesus-creatorThe serpent exposed them to self-centeredness and one of the results was that loss of innocence that kept them from even realizing that they were different in ways that might need covering.

Just look at children.  All children start out with this same innocence I am talking about.  You can bathe most two year olds, whether the same sex or not, in the same bathtub and they will not notice any difference between them.  This changes in every kids life at a different age.  It changes when they are taught the differences.  A kid will ask certain questions and we give them certain answers.  Our answers will be based on our own notions about our differences.  Some kids can maintain a level of innocence longer than others because some parents are not as anxious about those differences themselves.

Another area where kids are innocent is race.  A small child can play with or have friends of different races and just never perceive any differences.  Again, this usually ends when questions are raised and the answers the adults give start a child along the path to what they think of their differences.  Innocence lost.

I heard a white evangelist say that if he could preach as well as T D Jakes, he would not mind having Jakes color of skin.  He also said at another time that he would not preach at a church that did not welcome blacks.  This actually happened to him and he followed this conviction.  My question is, why, if he does love people of color, doesn’t he see that his first statement is blatantly racist?  I know many “Christians” that are much more vocal in their racism also.

Don Imus went through a lot of strife for statements about “nappy headed” basketball players but insisted it was not meant as a racial slur.  And what about our presidents statement about a black being articulate.  He also said, or people said for him, that nothing was meant.  And even closer, I know white “Christians” that would have their children marry a white atheist rather than a black Christian.

Racism is alive and well in America in 2009.  It is not as bad as it was at another time, but it is far from gone.  And not only is this a white problem, it is also a black problem and a Hispanic problem and many others.  But what really saddens me and has to grieve the Holy Spirit is that the church is not exempt.

Even the best of us have to describe people like this.  “He was a very dynamic black preacher.”  Or, “She is a very beautiful black woman.”  Or many other racially charged descriptive.  What is wrong with just saying he was a dynamic preacher or she is a beautiful woman?  Why do we continue to see everyone as so very different than we are?  Aren’t we all God’s children with no differences between Jew and Greek, male or female, black or white?

I know that everyone that uses the divisive words for descriptions is not using them in a racially motivated way.  But we have to begin to see all people as the same, even with the obvious differences.  All people are worthy of our love because God loves us all.

We are going to inaugurate a man for president tomorrow.  It will be a historic moment because he will be the first “black” president.  Or at least it is being hailed that way.  Actually his racial identity is more along the lines that we all should be.  He has more than a few distinctive racial markers in his makeup.  But yet he is a man with one body.

The church is supposed to be one body.  We need to start acting like it.

Tomorrow will be a historic day and I for one am proud of this nation in this one thing.  This was not even thought possible just fifty years ago.  I doubt when Obama was conceived that any of his family foresaw this day.  Now we need to move on, tearing down more walls in our society, our culture, and our lives.  One day a “black man” will be elected president and we will just say that a “man” was elected president.  Or this is my prayer.

One day we are going to be with God.  I read that we will be clothed in white robes.  But I wonder if maybe we might just once again, be naked before God.  Innocence found.

Love you all

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Monday, January 19th, 2009 at 6:37 am and is filed under America, Body of Christ, Eternity, Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

13 comments so far

Tammy
 1 

Very well said! :clap:

By the way… Happy Salvation Day!! You are 7 years old in the Lord!! Right?!

January 19th, 2009 at 10:23 am
John
 2 

excellent blog Sonny, very positive and upbeat. We enjoyed dinner with yall last night. Hope you are feeling more rested today especially since I see thats its a special day for you and precious Tammy. We love yall!

January 19th, 2009 at 12:01 pm
 3 

So, in the picture, how come adam and eve are naked but Jesus is wearing clothes?

January 19th, 2009 at 6:08 pm
 4 

Heath,

Are you really a fundamentalist? :)

Love you all

January 19th, 2009 at 8:14 pm
 5 

No, I am just wondering, if clothing is the badge of innocence lost, then why would God be wearing clothing? Wouldn’t this just point out to adam and eve their own nakedness?

Oh well, its a cheesy picture anyways.

BTW, the evangelist did not make a “racist” comment. It was a biggoted comment. Racism is the belief in the superiority of one race over another, (like saying black men just make better preachers than white men). Biggotry, on the other hand, is the disparagement of a race or group of people, such as the comment that was made.

January 19th, 2009 at 9:33 pm
John
 6 

Whether The evangelist is a racist or biggoted isnt the point of this article. If someone is one then they are probibly the other also. I dont think it would have helped the value of this article to show Jesus in the nude but mabey some of your readers would have enjoyed it. :hh:

January 19th, 2009 at 10:48 pm
 7 

John, are you trying to come across as a jerk there or am I just misunderstanding that last comment?

January 20th, 2009 at 12:00 am
 8 

Sonny,

I really appreciate your post. Growing up, I was not around many people who celebrated diversity (other than my mom and dad). And there were many questions that I had in my mind (esp. as to where I fit in with others) because my family looked “different” than some. My dad has a strong Native American heritage and thus some in our family have unique features (e.g. darker complexions; distinct facial features, etc.). When I was younger, and the constant ridicule from my peers set in, I found myself at times despising who I was. However, since entering God’s Kingdom, I am grateful for my heritage and realize the shallowness of judging persons simply by their appearance.

I believe God celebrates diversity. And I think that the church tightens its unity when celebrating its diversity. Otherwise, we tend to define unity by uniformity and suffer the sad consequences of such. By diversity, I am not speaking of a generalized inclusion of all things, but of the different people (from different families, regions, languages, countries, etc.) that enter into God’s Kingdom through faith in Jesus. These are very ones who are supposed to be family.

My prayer is that our church will embrace God’s vision for all persons to be part of the community of faith. I look out across our congregation at times and am saddened by the lack of diversity. I then ask myself – who am I reaching? Who are my friends? Am I, in some way, limiting the scope of Christ’s sacrifice by maintaining stereotypes, bigotry, racism, and the like, concerning the called-for companionship and brother/sisterhood that should character the people of God?

As you and I have discussed before, such issues are at the heart of salvation. I truly believe that a “Spirit-filled” Church is a beautiful mosaic of transformed lives which share a sincere commitment to loving God and neighbor.

Peace

January 20th, 2009 at 12:26 am
 9 

The evangelist statement was racist. If you say you would not mind stooping to the level of having a certain skin color, then you obviously feel yours is superior.

And as far as the picture goes, get over it. It is a picture that has something, if even cheesy little, to do with the post. We have disagreed before and we will again, but John is not being a jerk. He is just wondering about your focus as am I. And you get a little short every once in a while also.

I didn’t post this to be controversial. I just want to make us all think about ways we are possibly not helping the issue of racism. We are to love all. Even is we don’t like their skin color, their views of this nation, their understanding of ministry decisions, or a choice of a blog image.

Don’t fight over an image. :)

Thanks for your comments.

Love you all

January 20th, 2009 at 7:14 am
 10 

Well, it seemed to me that John said this to me: “I dont think it would have helped the value of this article to show Jesus in the nude but mabey some of your readers would have enjoyed it.” That seemed to be an attack on my writing and those who read my blog, which I did not appriciate.

Now, I am not sure if he was joking with you or directing it at me. That is why I asked for a clarification from him.

As far as the picture goes, I was trying to be humerous. Obviously nobody got it. But thanks for telling me to “get over it.” I will try… seeing how I was never bothered by it in the first place.

The comment on racism/biggotry was meant to point out that these terms are often used interchangibly but have diffrent meanings. One can be a biggot without being racist.

January 20th, 2009 at 12:36 pm
John
 11 

the tone of what I wrote was in response to what you wrote which I found to be very condescending and arrogant. Since I dont read your blog I would not direct any of my comments at your readers. Since you were SO concerned with Jesus being naked my comment was about you only. Sonny puts alot of time thought and prayer into each and everyone of these blogs. It saddens me that in an article this well written,that has such a valuable message , all you could find in it to comment on was Jesus not being naked and to have the nerve to try and educate him as to what defines a racist or a biggot. No i did not intend to be a jerk but I do find your attitude to be offensive. As im sure I have now offended you I apologize. This is the last I have to say on this subject.

January 20th, 2009 at 4:12 pm
Tammy
 12 

:hlp: Can anyone say testosterone?

I think this is a case of overly explaining, if ever I saw one.
Looks like a misunderstanding. :fite2:
Maybe a perfectly placed smiley would have helped avoid this chaos?! ;)
Maybe Heath was being funny-not fundamentalist… just a thought :CSL:
Maybe John was simply making a point…the picture is irrelevent to the substance of the post ??:
And maybe I will wish I had stayed out of this altogether. :sry:

big·ot (bgt)
n.
One who is strongly partial to one’s own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.

rac·ism (rszm)
n.
1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.

The difference matters not in this case, the point being made by Sonny is …

“Why do we continue to see everyone as so very different than we are? Aren’t we all God’s children with no differences between Jew and Greek, male or female, black or white?”

:RO: :mrgreen: :mad?: :wnk:

PS I think the picture is gorgeous :!:

January 20th, 2009 at 4:47 pm
 13 

Thanks Tammy and Shannon

The whole post has been taken over by some misunderstood comments while Shannon’s excellent comment has been overlooked, or at least not acknowledged.

I apologize if I have contributed to anything not worthy of Christ in this thread.

And yes, Shannon, this is what I want also. One day we will all be one people, but why do we have to wait until eternity.

Love you all

January 20th, 2009 at 5:12 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment

:) :D :lol: :P :twisted: :( :well: :o :cry: 8) 8O ;) :KISS: :oops: :RO: :| :x :roll: :arrow: :idea: :??: :!: :eat: :eyes: :$$: :wnk: :crzy: :burnup: :WOW: :pray: :mad?: :nunchk: :emb: :sry: :hlp: :zzz: :swt: :FIT: :bf6: :hrts: :luvu: :bf5: :nonono: :fite: :BH: :bf3: :clap: :hh: :laff: :bgeye: :fite2: :CSL: :SUN: :DNC: :NO: :mrgreen: :lovetransforms: :talk: :GT: :love U: :bf: :bf1: :HEAD: :sick: :bf2: :hdbng: more »