Posts Tagged ‘Belief’

Mark Twain presents certain tenets in his novel Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, which a casual reader will not easily discern.  From social commentary to religious ideology, he blends humor, satire, and adventure into a statement and a critique about the issues of his time and our own.  A “gospel,” of sorts, is established by focusing on the religious themes Twain merges with the identity of his character, Huck Finn.  Huck’s religious beliefs, his gospel, are not as far off the mark as he believes.  A gospel is supposed to be “good news,” but the religious beliefs that many tout as truth cannot be construed as good news in any way.  The religious beliefs that Huck exhibits, even if he does not see them as such, are closer to the Gospel of Christ than many church-going, religious people demonstrate, both then and now.

Providence is a word that is uncommon in religious exhortation today.  Typically, people use words and phrases such as God’s will, plan, purposes, direction, and especially his activity in this world to allude to the idea of Providence.  God is supposed to be guiding, directing and controlling the events and circumstances that surround us all, according to a number of conflicting expositions.  The Widow Douglas, who is Huck’s guardian, and her sister, Miss Watson, each take their own opportunity to instruct him in their interpretations, as he divulges:

Sometimes the widow would take me one side and talk about Providence in a way to make a body’s mouth water; but maybe next day Miss Watson would take hold and knock it all down again. I judged I could see that there was two Providences, and a poor chap would stand considerable show with the widow’s Providence, but if Miss Watson’s got him there warn’t no help for him any more.  (115)

Huck recognizes the discrepancies between the two views in which he is instructed.  These two views, with many variations, are still influential today.  God’s love is manifest in some teaching, but his wrath, anger, and judgment are the defining characteristics in most.  Huck instinctively realizes that a god that is mostly angry is one which cannot be easily appeased.  As events in his life unfold, with his abusive father, an enslaved friend, and a perilous journey, Huck has to be wondering where and how this god is working in his life.

Christianity today, especially the southern flavor, has a lot to say about an eternal destination for all.  Heaven and hell, everlasting bliss or infinite torment, the good place or the bad, supposedly form a dichotomy with no alternative; however, there are a multitude of descriptions for either one being taught every Sunday morning.  The Widow gives Huck her description of the “good place,” and he informs us, “She said all a body would have to do there was to go around all day long with a harp and sing, forever and ever. So I didn’t think much of it” (110).  From the beginning of Christianity, heaven has been described as an ethereal realm of clouds and singing cherubs, a fantastic Oz-like domain of golden streets and bejeweled gates and walls, or a vast throne-room where everyone gathers to offer everlasting praise and adoration to the creator.  After establishing his view concerning the good place, and wanting no place in it, Huck asks the Widow if she thinks his friend, Tom Sawyer, will make it in, and she assures him that Tom will not.  Huck declares that he “was glad about that, because I wanted him and me to be together” (110).  Huck’s impression of the eternal destination the Widow describes does not suit his adventurous soul, and he instinctively grasps concepts concerning love, community, and brotherhood that most of the faithful fail to ascertain.  Huck’s love for Tom is even more important to him than where they might be headed.

The Grangerfords introduce Huck to hypocrisy in the manifestation of brotherly love.  The Grangerfords are a kindhearted, church-going family who take Huck in when a steamboat hits his raft, and he is separated from Jim, the runaway slave and his traveling companion on the journey down the river.  Huck attends a church service with the family and makes the following observations:

It was pretty ornery preaching — all about brotherly love, and such-like tiresomeness; but everybody said it was a good sermon, and they all talked it over going home, and had such a powerful lot to say about faith and good works and free grace and preforeordestination, and I don’t know what all, that it did seem to me to be one of the roughest Sundays I had run across yet.  (183)

The Grangerfords think the sermon is good, and they have a long discussion about some of the precepts of their religion, like faith, good works and others.  Huck says the sermon was about “brotherly love” and other “tiresomeness,” and he describes it as “pretty ornery.”  The preaching was ugly and unpleasant in his opinion, but Huck does believe in brotherly love, even if he does not recognize this fact.  Huck finds the whole day, in his words, rough.  Is it the subject matter of the sermon, or the discussion that follows by his foster family?  It is probably the hypocrisy of the Grangerfords and all the other religious folk that he has observed.  This same family who has taken him in and is having lively discussions about brotherly love and good works is at the same time in a deadly feud with their neighbors, the Shepherdsons.  Huck again recognizes the inadequacy of this revealed gospel.

Huck seems to grasp the important concepts from the bible as evidenced in his conversation with Jim about King Solomon’s ruling concerning a disputed child.  Jim believes Solomon is not wise at all when Solomon decrees that the child be cut in half to satisfy the claim of both women who profess to be the child’s mother.  But Huck understands the reasoning of Solomon; the true mother will love the child enough to give it up.  Huck intuitively grasps the essence of love.

In the bible, Paul instructs Timothy to command the people of Ephesus “not to teach false doctrines any longer or to devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies. Such things promote controversial speculations rather than advancing God’s work—which is by faith”  (1 Timothy 1:3-4, NIV).  On another occasion, when the Widow Douglass is telling Huck about Moses, he is excited in the beginning of the story but then “she let it out that Moses had been dead a considerable long time” (109).  Huck did not care to hear about Moses after this because he “don’t take no stock in dead people” (109).  There are many things that people of faith argue about: Should the creation account be understood as literal?  Was the biblical flood local or world encompassing?  What are appropriate dietary prohibitions?  Should I refrain from cutting grass on the Sabbath?  What should I read or watch for entertainment?  This agenda of exclusion comes from dead people, while the agenda of inclusion, the law of love, comes from someone living.  In stating that he takes no stock in dead people, Huck is standing beside Paul and discrediting those who exclude.  Huck understands the revelation, without acknowledging it as such, that the Old Testament is not the governing authority for true followers of Jesus.  Huck knows, subconsciously, that the Gospel of Christ is the only way to advance God’s work, and he unwittingly works for this cause.

Huck Finn’s crisis of faith comes when he feels the conviction of sin in his actions that involve helping Jim, a runaway slave, to escape.  He has grown very fond of Jim, but he feels that he is at the junction between heaven and hell.  He prays, then feels worse, and finally writes a note that will give Jim up to the slave’s owners.  Huck then achieves a sense of relief but is still not completely satisfied.  He again wrestles with his conscience.  He knows that he should obey the law and turn Jim in, which is good and should help in any bid for heaven, but he wants to help Jim, which is bad, and he believes this will land him in hell.  He stands at this juncture holding the note he has written and makes his decision.  He says to himself, “All right, then, I’ll go to hell” (246). Huck does not wholly divulge his beliefs regarding the netherworld, but they are probably in line with most of the teachings of the fundamentalist churches of the southern states today.  In choosing hell rather than turning Jim in, he believes he has sentenced himself to eternal torture in a lake of fire.  He understands that the fire will ravage him but never consume him.  This interpretation of a pain-ridden eternal destination for sinners is what most of the faithful convey to the masses, but Huck’s love for Jim, as well as his desire to help free him, actually allow Huck to make the truly righteous choice.  In choosing hell, and going against the predominant teachings of his day, Huck is really choosing heaven.

Mark Twain uses the character of Huck Finn to convey some of his own misgivings and solicitude about organized religion and what it conveys to the masses.  Twain’s allusions to these teachings and the bible provoke thought and consideration when they are held up against contemporary issues in any era.  Through Huck Finn’s moral growth and religious deliberation, Twain addresses a number of issues.  Is God in control?  How is he working in this present space and time?  Whose view is right about eternity?  What in the bible is really important?  Sin, choice, hypocrisy, love-what is the truth concerning these issues?

Huck Finn is a fourteen-year-old boy who is making life decisions that are more Christ-like than most bible-thumping, fundamentalist, southern Christians.  He does make mistakes in judgment, like when he allows Tom to torment Jim on a few occasions, but his love and concern for others is readily apparent.  He concludes rightly that a wrathful, vengeance-seeking god cannot be satisfied.  He perceives the hypocrisy embodied in the sermons and actions of the religious assemblies to which he is exposed.  Heaven, hell, and eternity are concepts he does not pretend to understand fully.   Jesus said, “So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you” (Matthew 7:12 NIV), and Huck personifies this scripture.  Excluding his childish pranks, Huck does not want anyone to come to a bad end.  He never wishes harm on anyone, even those who do him harm.  Jesus, when asked what the greatest commandment was, replied, “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.  This is the first and greatest commandment.  And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments” (Matthew 22:37-40 NIV).  Huck never reveals any love for God, but his actions epitomize love for his neighbor.  In a time when it is considered right, moral, and even biblical to enslave a human being and treat him like disposable property, Huck makes a choice to burn in an ever-lasting hell rather than turn a friend back over to the institution of slavery.  The gospel, according to Huck, is simply love for others.  It is seeing humanity as a community of equals, all deserving the same treatment.  This is what Jesus tried to emphasize, the very thing for which he gave his life.  As far as Huck’s love for God, he ultimately proves it in his actionable love for his neighbor.  This is truly the gospel, and it is good news for all who love and are loved.

Tags: , , , , , ,

13
Jun

The Good

   Posted by: Sonny    in God, Goodness, Kingdom

“You must have a genius for charity as well as for anything else.  As for doing good; that is one of the professions which is full. Moreover I have tried it fairly and, strange as it may seem, am satisfied that it does not agree with my constitution.”  Henry David Thoreau

Last November I had to read Walden by Henry David Thoreau for my literature class.  Thoreau is one of the great American transcendentalist authors along with Ralph Waldo Emerson, who sort of mentored him.  Both of these authors are rather hard to read and while I agree with some of their beliefs, they also hold many that are a little out there in my opinion and not very easily grasped without fuller thought and time than I had to give in class.

Thoreau’s thoughts about goodness, or doing good, grabbed my attention though.  In addition to the quote above, he also wrote the following.

“What good I do, in the common sense of that word, must be aside from my main path, and for the most part wholly unintended. Men say, practically, Begin where you are and such as you are, without aiming mainly to become of more worth, and with kindness aforethought go about doing good. If I were to preach at all in this strain, I should say rather, Set about being good…A man is not a good man to me because he will feed me if I should be starving, or warm me if I should be freezing, or pull me out of a ditch if I should ever fall into one. I can find you a Newfoundland dog that will do as much. Philanthropy is not love for one’s fellow-man in the broadest sense.”

Thoreau’s beliefs about doing good can be summarized as: first, there are plenty of people doing good so it is not for everyone; second, it was definitely not for him personally; third, “being” good is valued and is not the same as “doing” good; and finally, altruistic giving of oneself will not make one a good person.  My professor led a discussion on this passage in which she and some of the others in class agreed and defended Thoreau’s position.  They all seemed to believe that one can be a good person without consciously, decidedly, doing good and that if you had to make yourself do good then you were not really a good person and the very act of making yourself do good negated the goodness of the act.  In other words, we just need to be the best possible people we can be and that will be good enough.

I disagreed then and now.  I told my professor and the class that we are not automatically good people and that we must practice being good by always attempting to consciously do good.  And whether we have to think about doing good or not, good is still good.  All people are called to love one another and true love is shown in the very acts that Thoreau seemed to disdain.  One of my questions is; how does not doing good make it possible to ever be considered good?  I actually believe that Thoreau and others who believe this way are really just attempting to belittle the people of faith who sometimes do reach out with good works but with wrong motivations.

“For this very reason, make every effort to add to your faith goodness…” 2 Peter 1:5

Our instructions are clear.  We are to add to our faith goodness.  How do we do that?  What is goodness?

I believe goodness is Godliness.  I believe good is of God even when those doing good may not even believe in a god.  There are people in the world doing a lot of good with their philanthropic and charitable acts who would never darken the doorsteps of a church with their shadow.  There are many people of faith doing the same.  There are also people of faith who do not do much but complain about those that are doing good but who do not believe the same way they do.  I have heard Christians knock some of Rick Warren’s charitable actions in the recent past because he has welcomed the help of some outside our faith.  That is ridiculous.  Let anyone that wants to do good do it.  We need to applaud their efforts and help anyone doing good that we can.  I have been vocal about my own thoughts concerning some of Warrens theology and his testimony, but never about his charity.

We all, especially the community of faith, must add to our faith the goodness of God and the only way we can do that is to start doing good in any and every way we can.  While worship, praise, reading your bible and supporting a church are right and proper, they do not come close to doing what we are supposed to be doing which is to love people.  To love people is to do for people.  Peter told us to add seven virtues to our faith: goodness, knowledge, self-control, perseverance, godliness, brotherly kindness, love.  I believe that to grow in Christ-likeness we must do this and we must do it in the order prescribed.  As a follower of Jesus we have to begin by doing good, even before a quest for knowledge.  By working on these virtues in order we can ultimately serve the Kingdom in mighty ways.

Thoreau was satisfied that doing good was not agreeable to his constitution.  I believe a lot of us are pretty satisfied with this attitude also.  Jesus was not.  Are you?

Love you all

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Mat 6:14-15  For if you forgive others their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you, but if you do not forgive others their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.

tues-town-ha3llI attended a Baptist church this past Sunday and the sermon text was Matthew 6:14-15.  The message given by the pastor focused on Gods forgiveness of us almost entirely and very little on our need to forgive others.  In light of the scripture above I was wondering about a couple of things.

How important is our forgiveness of others?

What do you think are the consequences for us if we do not forgive others?

How does your belief effect any thought of the doctrine of eternal security?

Love you all

Tags: , , , , , , ,

28
Jul

Tuesday Town Hall 40…Godsmack

   Posted by: Sonny    in Townhall Tuesday

tues-townhallI know that Godsmack is the name of a heavy metal band but that is not what this discussion is about.  I also know that some of you might be wondering where I have been.  Let’s just say that life is a little full and quite hectic right now and I will try to post soon about what is going on and I am trying to get a better handle on this busyness so that I can at least write a couple of times a week again.  Thanks for hanging in there.

As far as the title goes, I am inteested in knowing what you think and believe about God punishing us.  Wondering if He does smack us.

Do you think God punishes today in light of what Jesus showed us concerning His mercy, grace, and love for us?

If you believe He does, what methods do you believe He uses?

What is your justification for your beliefs?

I miss the conversations and hope to not only post some more but I do hope you will comment.

Love you all

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

21
Jun

Happy Fathers Day

   Posted by: Sonny    in God, Holiday

fathers_day_sunsetMy Dad’s name was Bill Cable.  He was not my biological father but he adopted me when I was only two years old and I never knew or met the man that was there when I was conceived.  He is a father also, to me and others later, I heard, so I hope he has a great day also if he still lives.  But he was not my Dad.  Bill Cable was.

I did not even know that I was adopted until sometime in my fourteenth year.  And Bill never gave me any reason to even think it.  I have a sister and two brothers that he was the biological father of but there was never any favoritism.  Well, actually there might have been at times, but it was favoritism towards me.  He loved me as much as or seemingly even more sometimes as any of us.

He was a small man.  Standing only 5′ 2″ tall and weighing about 125 pounds, I still remember him having me sit in his lap when I got out of the Army at six feet tall and 185 pounds.  It was ridiculous looking probably but I am smiling just thinking about it.  My eyes are a little watery also.

Bill Cable, my Dad, died in 1991 at the age of 55.  Much too young and way too early to go.  I miss him.  I don’t talk about it much but before Jesus introduced Himself to me there was no other person on this planet that I felt comfortable telling my deepest secrets, fears, dreams, and thoughts to than my Dad.  I never have been a very open person and have just started growing into it in the last few years even to the degree I am now.  But my Dad would listen, never judge, and tell me like he saw it.  It was not always comfortable but it was real.  How many people tell anyone anything real anymore?  Not enough.  At least not in my life or experience.

Even though I had the best example for a loving father, not a perfect man by any means, but a real, truly loving man which is what really matters, that anyone could have, I still blew it when it came my time.  I have six children.  Five of them are sons that are not mine biologically.  While I do believe I loved them a long time ago, I know I did not do it the right way.  Some of it was me, some was the enemy of all of our souls, but mostly it was my lack of belief that that enemy or God was real.  My Father, God, has and still is, changing me.  I thank Him for that most of all because I do not like who I used to be.

We all have a Father in heaven, whether we have one here or not.  And He is good and gracious and merciful and loving, but most of all He is real.  And He tells us like it is.  If we will only listen.

If you have a father here, let him know you love him and appreciate him today.  Even if he was or is not who you think he should be, he is your father.  And who among us is who our Father, God, wants us to be anyway.  And if you are a father, then be the best one you can be while you still have time.

Happy Fathers Day to all and Dad, I miss you and love you.

Love you all

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Page 1 of 512345