1
Nov

{TOTUS TUUS}

   Posted by: Sonny   in Spiritual Warfare

This page is for you.  That is what the Latin title stands for.  It means “totally yours.”  It sounds so much more important in Latin, doesn’t it?

First, let me assure you that it does not bother me that you make a comment or ask a question in a post that might not exactly line up with the article content.  Saying that, I know that on a few blogs I have wanted to do the same thing but am trying to be considerate to the host.  So my thought or question goes unanswered. 

I played around with the thought of adding a forum.  I decided at this time it is not needed.  This site has already turned into much than I thought it might be.  I initially thought I would be roaming around here alone.  I am thankful that I have had the response that I have had so far. 

I am learning from all of you. 

This is the page that you can come to to ask questions of each other, to ask off topic questions of me, or just to say hello to someone you might miss.  That way you don’t have to hesitate to keep from “hijacking” my post’s. 

If this gets popular and I see a need for a forum, it will be added later.  For now use the comment section to say what you want to say. 

I will only step in if asked or if needed to avoid offense. 

*****Nov. 8, 2008  It may become necessary to “prune” this section periodically.  If your post disappears it will only be after it has enough time here to be read by most and if it is not directly related to an ongoing topic.  You can let me know when you are tired of scrolling.  I am trying to figure out if I can change the order of the comments to place the newest at the top.  But only on this page.  No luck yet.  Anybody out there know how or if it can be done?***** 

Love you all

53 comments so far

Connie
 1 

John,
I wanted to tell you how glad I am that you’re feelling better. I really am. It has absoutely nothing to do with the fact that I wanted to be the very first person to use the “Totus Tuus” page :halo:

I really do love you,
Connie

November 2nd, 2008 at 10:13 am   (Quote)
Sonny
 13 

Justin,
You said this over on the other post. That is okay but some people do not go back to the old post very much. I am moving this here because this is why I made this page. For you to say or ask off topic stuff and for people to get used to checking in here rather than continuall chasing down comments all over the site.

Your thoughts and question for all…

“I just read a column supporting OSAS (once saved always saved) and something occurred to me that I haven’t thought of before. One of the main arguments, probably THE main argument, in support of OSAS is that there is absolutely nothing you can do to obtain or keep salvation. Salvation is a gift of God and we can do nothing to obtain it or keep it. If we don’t believe that, we are trusting in ourselves instead of trusting in Christ.
But even this statement says we must do something our self. We must trust in Christ. If there were truly absolutely nothing we could do, the only path to salvation would be if Jesus saved us regardless of our trust in him. God would have to put the “trust” in us and so we aren’t really trusting in him, just exercising the trust he placed. To hold this view you must believe that for those who aren’t saved, the reason they aren’t saved is that God has not placed that trust in them. The logical conclusion if this is true is that there is no free will.
That means I was bound to write this paragraph.
That also means that people like me who argue that we do indeed have free will are pre-ordained by God to so argue.
What do you think?
I have to go now.
Really”

You are right in your assessment. Some of us can see the logical problem with rationalizing OSAS with free will. But the staunch Calvinist has no problem with it because they basically do not believe in free will and certainly not the libertarian free will that we ascribe to. They believe in the meticulous sovereignty of God. They believe He basically did what you said by placing the trust in us and causing you and me to write about it.

Besides that they believe He only picked some for this grace and others are just left out.
We also have our own set of problems with free will and God’s sovereignty. It is where most of my currents train of thought has been.

A question of my own. How can we truly choose or not choose if God already knows our choice? If He knows what we are to choose tomorrow, can I in fact, choose otherwise?

Love you all
.

Sonny
 15 

Justin,

I know the time thing actually scares me also. My time, that is.

In responding to your statements though, the time is at least for the moment available. The question is how can God know my response when I haven’t made it yet. It is being formulated as I write but is it already even there for Him to know. And if we imply that He doesn’t know it fully but maybe just has a very intelligently thought out prediction of what I will say based on my past responses, does that deny or belittle Him. I don’t think so.

1. Our knowledge on a past event has no bearing on choice. If we had one or not, what we know we did cannot be changed. So no answer there. But if God knew yesterday that I would say this very thing, then could I have said anything any different, and if you believe I could then I want the explanation as to how that can be possible. If He knows my action before I do anything, how can I defy that knowledge. Exhaustive foreknowledge seems to deny the very existence of free will. This is actually what our reformed brothers believe.

2. And your belief, not foreknowledge, about what you are going to do today or anytime in the future does not equate to this situation either. The very real fact that we all do some things that we never thought we would, still future to us, either is a statement for free will or it is a statement for Gods manipulation of us against our will. I believe in this free will. We can and do choose, whether we mostly know the probable choice ahead of time or not.

I believe God knows those same probable choices even better than we do. That’s one of the things that make Him who He is. Amazing. But I don’t see how He can exhaustively know my choices and how it is possible to go against that knowledge, logically taking away free will even if we perceive a choice.

Love you all

Sonny
 17 

If I could somehow know that there was no way I could make a certain choice, then it would indeed take away the aspect of free will. Exhaustive foreknowledge is just that, exhaustive. It implies that things cannot be changed. We are quick to deny the ideas of fate and destiny as put out by eastern philosophy but when we espouse the idea that God knows all before it happens then we are actually subscribing to the same thing. If God knows it will happen there is no way it cannot happen. For free will to really be what it is supposed to be, then some things, maybe not all, are indeed not settled and therefore can’t be known.

Shannon can look and I can provide many scripture for this idea but you could find many for yours also. And the reformed theologians like Piper, Sproul and many others have plenty of scripture and years of education to back them up.

Some of us in the pentecostal denominations have spent a little too much time chasing experiences instead of knowledge to give a cohesive argument. We have borrowed for too long from the traditional reformed theologians, tweaking it just enough to be logically uncohesive, and moving on. Anyone that questions this is usually looked at as heretical when we do not swallow the whole ideas behind traditional ideology.

This is probably not the best place to deal with this. But do you believe, since God already knew it, that anyone but Obama could have been elected. And I don’t need just a yes; I need a logical answer of exactly how that could have happened.

This is not a challenge meant to bring any offense. I am still waiting for someone to show me how we can possibly make a choice that goes against what God already knows.

Love you

Justin A
 26 

Sonny,
My comment on Esau you did not address. I just read the whole chapter (Romans 9). I think I have heard it preached before that God hated Esau even before he was born. After reading the chapter I don’t think it is saying that. I will try to be more diligent in making sure what I hear (or what I think I hear) is true.
However it does plainly say that before Esau was born, God said the elder would serve the younger. This is an example of God having foreknowledge. Did Esau have the choice to put God first? Could Jacob have chosen to be the hunter and could he have chosen to sell his birthright to Esau instead of the other way around? Could the situation have been reversed? I think they could have chosen anything they wanted to but God knew what they would choose. Here is my attempt at a formula. Man has free will (supported by many scriptures). God knows what men will do (at least in certain instances as supported by the story of Esau). Therefore God can know what someone will choose and they can also have free will.
By the way, most of this whole chapter seems to be saying that God decides who goes to Hell and who obtains mercy. I still believe in free will based on the summary at the end of the chapter. What do you think about Romans 9?
The scary part about free will is that it appears to me that God in some instances does remove free will and hardens hearts when people refuse him. I am thankful for his mercy.
(Maybe you need a forum just on free will. I have no idea how hard that is to set up. This is taking over your Totus Tuus column. Sorry.)

Justin A
 30 

Your challenge is, “How we can possibly make a choice that goes against what God already knows?”

Part of the problem is the way the question is phrased. The issue is whether God can know what choice we are going to make. If he can, your question becomes, “How can we make a choice that is different from the choice we make?” I think you will agree that is not a good way to phrase the question. The question I would ask first is, “Does God know what choices we will make?” The second question I would ask is, “Do we have free will?” If God knows what choices we will make and if we have free will then foreknowledge does not preclude free will. I will point out again that my early examples, such as God reading tomorrow’s newspaper, were not intended to be proofs. They were just intended to show that it is at least possible to think of a way that free will can be compatible with foreknowledge. The proof must be taken from the Bible. I have seen many scriptures that can be construed to imply that God did not have foreknowledge of everything. It seems to me that if there is even one scripture that shows that God knows the choice someone will make before they make it, that will prove that God can have foreknowledge and we can still have free will. To answer the first question here are a few examples: God said the elder would serve the younger (Romans 9). Jesus knew that Judas would betray him. Jesus knew the colt would be tied in a certain place. The list could be long. As to the second question, there are also many Scriptures that certainly seem to indicate that we have free will. For example, John 3:16 would have no meaning if we did not have free will. Let me know if you see any flaws in my logic. BTW, the granddaughter picture is great.

Sonny
 32 

“Let me apply your question to my analogy. How can we possibly make a choice that goes against what today’s newspaper said we made? We could have made the choice differently but then the newspaper would have read differently.”

Exactly. The newspaper is an after the fact, or choice, report. Does not apply to foreknowledge.

“ We could make any choice we want but then God would know that choice also.”

Agreed. Know but not foreknow.

“Again, this is just an analogy. Whatever the Bible says is the truth regardless of our analogies and questions.”

Agreed, but what , exactly, does the bible say about exhaustive foreknowledge?

“If the Bible says we have free will and if the Bible says God knows what choice we will make then foreknowledge doesn’t preclude free will.”

Agreed on the if the bible says part but again, see my previous statement. I do still believe exhaustive foreknowledge does preclude the whole concept of free will. And as I stated, I believe in free will.

“ I have given just a few examples. I think we could find more. One possible scenario is that anytime God knows the future we do not have free will. This seems to me to negate the whosoever in John 3:16.”

If He wants to suspend free will to bring about what He purposes then that is alright. I just don’t believe He does very often. First because of His promises and second, because He does not have to. And I don’t see how this negates any statement in scripture, especially John 3:16. It actually implies, sort of , what I am saying. That whosoever wants to be saved can be and that God does not “foreknow” who will.

“I think you tied this issue in with the problem of suffering. I’m not sure what you mean by that if you would like to expand on it.”

In an upcoming post, I am going to address this.

Love you

Hello all,

This is the first time I have commented on this page. I enjoy reading all of your comments…headache and all…LOL :love U:

Please keep our family in your prayers. We have another round with the courts and DHR coming up on December 9th.2008 and again January 20, 2009. We have fought for 13 years to keep our (5) grandchildren together after they were placed for adoption. We lost our battle the beginning of October when we were given a new case worker and judge who were not familiar with the 13 year history of our family.

This case worker was fresh out of college, we were her first case and she had something to prove. She abused her power and placed our grandchildren in “state owned” facilities (AKA hospitals/prisons) and foster homes. The children were spilt up and we are having major ordeal trying to visit all of them. :angel:

I would like to use this opportunity to ask if anyone has been WRONGED by DHR ( Department of Human Resources) to please contact me. We have found several incidents where this case worker violated our rights and privacy. :twisted: My attorney is doing a class action suit and we need people to participate. If you know a family or individual who has been torn apart by this evil agency, let me know. This case worker has now resigned her position at DHR as of November 21,2008 but not before she tore ourfamily completely apart :!:

My contact info is: princedee@bellsouth.net

205-663-3700-hm

This is my plea against the “evil” we have encountered.

Love and prayers, :lovetransforms:

Dee

November 25th, 2008 at 11:19 am   (Quote)

This would be a great new post on the forum. This page is good also, so why not try it over on A Sonny Gathering also. Sooner or later I will have to close the comments on this page because of the length.

The forum is going to be a great place for announcements such as this and other discussions. If everybody will go over there and register, so your posts will be counted, then go to one of the forums and select new topic and post away. The more the merrier.

Love you all :)

December 5th, 2008 at 1:37 pm   (Quote)

Aiden Layne was born January 7 2009 and is the son of our youngest niece Mikah. Adam is the father and his grandparents are Shane and Katrina.

Aiden Layne

Shane a grandpa?? :lol:

January 10th, 2009 at 10:49 pm   (Quote)
Chris
 53 

Just a thought.

Let’s restart, and give some basis for why these post are the way they are.

It forces people to think or to run. If people choose to run that is fine, but God did not ask us to shy away from controversy.

Any way to advance God is the right thing to do, and everyone has a different way to go about it.

I love the site and it has brought me closer to God as opposed to further away. I have been reading more and have learned things I never would have thought about.

I am sorry that Jesse felt that he can’t post anymore, but that is unfortunately his loss. Because through all the controversy there is a lot of truth and sense being discussed.

I feel more comfortable in this blog than going to a church and having someone spoon feed me the information they feel is important while leaving out critical elements from their sermons. They do this just to keep themselves in power and the masses ignorant. Just like the politicians.

There are too many divisions in the church to even mention, and when someone feels uncomfortable maybe it gives them the chance to think instead of be lead.

We should only be following God/Jesus not the people who run the church; or any other man, woman, or child who exist.

This site gives me the chance to expand on what I know, and that is more than what I have gotten out of years attending church.

Sonny, I say keep it going, but advertise it more and put some lighter topics for those who want to see that as well. The site is great to me, but to some others I guess they don’t see it that way.

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment
:) :D :lol: :P :twisted: :( :well: :o :cry: 8) 8O ;) :KISS: :oops: :RO: :| :x :roll: :arrow: :idea: :??: :!: :eat: :eyes: :$$: :wnk: :crzy: :burnup: :WOW: :pray: :mad?: :nunchk: :emb: :sry: :hlp: :zzz: :swt: :FIT: :bf6: :hrts: :luvu: :bf5: :nonono: :fite: :BH: :bf3: :clap: :hh: :laff: :bgeye: :fite2: :CSL: :SUN: :DNC: :NO: :mrgreen: :lovetransforms: :talk: :GT: :love U: :bf: :bf1: :HEAD: :sick: :bf2: :hdbng:
more »