Posts Tagged ‘Character’

Mark Twain presents certain tenets in his novel Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, which a casual reader will not easily discern.  From social commentary to religious ideology, he blends humor, satire, and adventure into a statement and a critique about the issues of his time and our own.  A “gospel,” of sorts, is established by focusing on the religious themes Twain merges with the identity of his character, Huck Finn.  Huck’s religious beliefs, his gospel, are not as far off the mark as he believes.  A gospel is supposed to be “good news,” but the religious beliefs that many tout as truth cannot be construed as good news in any way.  The religious beliefs that Huck exhibits, even if he does not see them as such, are closer to the Gospel of Christ than many church-going, religious people demonstrate, both then and now.

Providence is a word that is uncommon in religious exhortation today.  Typically, people use words and phrases such as God’s will, plan, purposes, direction, and especially his activity in this world to allude to the idea of Providence.  God is supposed to be guiding, directing and controlling the events and circumstances that surround us all, according to a number of conflicting expositions.  The Widow Douglas, who is Huck’s guardian, and her sister, Miss Watson, each take their own opportunity to instruct him in their interpretations, as he divulges:

Sometimes the widow would take me one side and talk about Providence in a way to make a body’s mouth water; but maybe next day Miss Watson would take hold and knock it all down again. I judged I could see that there was two Providences, and a poor chap would stand considerable show with the widow’s Providence, but if Miss Watson’s got him there warn’t no help for him any more.  (115)

Huck recognizes the discrepancies between the two views in which he is instructed.  These two views, with many variations, are still influential today.  God’s love is manifest in some teaching, but his wrath, anger, and judgment are the defining characteristics in most.  Huck instinctively realizes that a god that is mostly angry is one which cannot be easily appeased.  As events in his life unfold, with his abusive father, an enslaved friend, and a perilous journey, Huck has to be wondering where and how this god is working in his life.

Christianity today, especially the southern flavor, has a lot to say about an eternal destination for all.  Heaven and hell, everlasting bliss or infinite torment, the good place or the bad, supposedly form a dichotomy with no alternative; however, there are a multitude of descriptions for either one being taught every Sunday morning.  The Widow gives Huck her description of the “good place,” and he informs us, “She said all a body would have to do there was to go around all day long with a harp and sing, forever and ever. So I didn’t think much of it” (110).  From the beginning of Christianity, heaven has been described as an ethereal realm of clouds and singing cherubs, a fantastic Oz-like domain of golden streets and bejeweled gates and walls, or a vast throne-room where everyone gathers to offer everlasting praise and adoration to the creator.  After establishing his view concerning the good place, and wanting no place in it, Huck asks the Widow if she thinks his friend, Tom Sawyer, will make it in, and she assures him that Tom will not.  Huck declares that he “was glad about that, because I wanted him and me to be together” (110).  Huck’s impression of the eternal destination the Widow describes does not suit his adventurous soul, and he instinctively grasps concepts concerning love, community, and brotherhood that most of the faithful fail to ascertain.  Huck’s love for Tom is even more important to him than where they might be headed.

The Grangerfords introduce Huck to hypocrisy in the manifestation of brotherly love.  The Grangerfords are a kindhearted, church-going family who take Huck in when a steamboat hits his raft, and he is separated from Jim, the runaway slave and his traveling companion on the journey down the river.  Huck attends a church service with the family and makes the following observations:

It was pretty ornery preaching — all about brotherly love, and such-like tiresomeness; but everybody said it was a good sermon, and they all talked it over going home, and had such a powerful lot to say about faith and good works and free grace and preforeordestination, and I don’t know what all, that it did seem to me to be one of the roughest Sundays I had run across yet.  (183)

The Grangerfords think the sermon is good, and they have a long discussion about some of the precepts of their religion, like faith, good works and others.  Huck says the sermon was about “brotherly love” and other “tiresomeness,” and he describes it as “pretty ornery.”  The preaching was ugly and unpleasant in his opinion, but Huck does believe in brotherly love, even if he does not recognize this fact.  Huck finds the whole day, in his words, rough.  Is it the subject matter of the sermon, or the discussion that follows by his foster family?  It is probably the hypocrisy of the Grangerfords and all the other religious folk that he has observed.  This same family who has taken him in and is having lively discussions about brotherly love and good works is at the same time in a deadly feud with their neighbors, the Shepherdsons.  Huck again recognizes the inadequacy of this revealed gospel.

Huck seems to grasp the important concepts from the bible as evidenced in his conversation with Jim about King Solomon’s ruling concerning a disputed child.  Jim believes Solomon is not wise at all when Solomon decrees that the child be cut in half to satisfy the claim of both women who profess to be the child’s mother.  But Huck understands the reasoning of Solomon; the true mother will love the child enough to give it up.  Huck intuitively grasps the essence of love.

In the bible, Paul instructs Timothy to command the people of Ephesus “not to teach false doctrines any longer or to devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies. Such things promote controversial speculations rather than advancing God’s work—which is by faith”  (1 Timothy 1:3-4, NIV).  On another occasion, when the Widow Douglass is telling Huck about Moses, he is excited in the beginning of the story but then “she let it out that Moses had been dead a considerable long time” (109).  Huck did not care to hear about Moses after this because he “don’t take no stock in dead people” (109).  There are many things that people of faith argue about: Should the creation account be understood as literal?  Was the biblical flood local or world encompassing?  What are appropriate dietary prohibitions?  Should I refrain from cutting grass on the Sabbath?  What should I read or watch for entertainment?  This agenda of exclusion comes from dead people, while the agenda of inclusion, the law of love, comes from someone living.  In stating that he takes no stock in dead people, Huck is standing beside Paul and discrediting those who exclude.  Huck understands the revelation, without acknowledging it as such, that the Old Testament is not the governing authority for true followers of Jesus.  Huck knows, subconsciously, that the Gospel of Christ is the only way to advance God’s work, and he unwittingly works for this cause.

Huck Finn’s crisis of faith comes when he feels the conviction of sin in his actions that involve helping Jim, a runaway slave, to escape.  He has grown very fond of Jim, but he feels that he is at the junction between heaven and hell.  He prays, then feels worse, and finally writes a note that will give Jim up to the slave’s owners.  Huck then achieves a sense of relief but is still not completely satisfied.  He again wrestles with his conscience.  He knows that he should obey the law and turn Jim in, which is good and should help in any bid for heaven, but he wants to help Jim, which is bad, and he believes this will land him in hell.  He stands at this juncture holding the note he has written and makes his decision.  He says to himself, “All right, then, I’ll go to hell” (246). Huck does not wholly divulge his beliefs regarding the netherworld, but they are probably in line with most of the teachings of the fundamentalist churches of the southern states today.  In choosing hell rather than turning Jim in, he believes he has sentenced himself to eternal torture in a lake of fire.  He understands that the fire will ravage him but never consume him.  This interpretation of a pain-ridden eternal destination for sinners is what most of the faithful convey to the masses, but Huck’s love for Jim, as well as his desire to help free him, actually allow Huck to make the truly righteous choice.  In choosing hell, and going against the predominant teachings of his day, Huck is really choosing heaven.

Mark Twain uses the character of Huck Finn to convey some of his own misgivings and solicitude about organized religion and what it conveys to the masses.  Twain’s allusions to these teachings and the bible provoke thought and consideration when they are held up against contemporary issues in any era.  Through Huck Finn’s moral growth and religious deliberation, Twain addresses a number of issues.  Is God in control?  How is he working in this present space and time?  Whose view is right about eternity?  What in the bible is really important?  Sin, choice, hypocrisy, love-what is the truth concerning these issues?

Huck Finn is a fourteen-year-old boy who is making life decisions that are more Christ-like than most bible-thumping, fundamentalist, southern Christians.  He does make mistakes in judgment, like when he allows Tom to torment Jim on a few occasions, but his love and concern for others is readily apparent.  He concludes rightly that a wrathful, vengeance-seeking god cannot be satisfied.  He perceives the hypocrisy embodied in the sermons and actions of the religious assemblies to which he is exposed.  Heaven, hell, and eternity are concepts he does not pretend to understand fully.   Jesus said, “So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you” (Matthew 7:12 NIV), and Huck personifies this scripture.  Excluding his childish pranks, Huck does not want anyone to come to a bad end.  He never wishes harm on anyone, even those who do him harm.  Jesus, when asked what the greatest commandment was, replied, “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.  This is the first and greatest commandment.  And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments” (Matthew 22:37-40 NIV).  Huck never reveals any love for God, but his actions epitomize love for his neighbor.  In a time when it is considered right, moral, and even biblical to enslave a human being and treat him like disposable property, Huck makes a choice to burn in an ever-lasting hell rather than turn a friend back over to the institution of slavery.  The gospel, according to Huck, is simply love for others.  It is seeing humanity as a community of equals, all deserving the same treatment.  This is what Jesus tried to emphasize, the very thing for which he gave his life.  As far as Huck’s love for God, he ultimately proves it in his actionable love for his neighbor.  This is truly the gospel, and it is good news for all who love and are loved.

Tags: , , , , , ,

11
Jan

The Meek Shall Inherit…

   Posted by: Sonny    in Fruit of the Spirit, Holy Spirit

But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law.  Gal 5:22-23

There was a time not too long ago when most children did not have much to do with me.  I believe they were probably a little intimidated by the perpetual scowl and the fact that I didn’t really care about or notice them.  They mostly avoided any interaction with me, even when I tried on occasion to reach out to them.  But some say that children know or perceive things that we as adults do not.  Maybe those few knew that I only did it out of politeness or for personal gain of some sort.

Now I am starting to encounter some problems that I don’t handle very readily.  Children are starting to like me.  And I don’t know how to respond.  The old fake responses do not work because I do care about and love them now, only I don’t react very well.

earthChildren have always loved my wife with abandon and she loves and relates to them so well that I am in danger of covetousness.  I want that and am starting to actually need it.  One night in the revival last week, a little girl that is usually all over my wife, came and sat beside me while my wife was practicing singing.  She was sitting next to me and playing, making faces and other kid stuff, and I was just doing my best to respond.  And probably not doing very well.

I love it, but not only is this new to me, it is a mystery also.  Why the change in so many children in their attitudes towards me?

Maybe it is the fruit.  I know that I am growing daily in Christ and that the Holy Spirit is working steadily to change me, so maybe it is an evidence of the next to last fruit as listed by Paul in Galatians.

Gentleness, or meekness, as it is translated in some versions of the bible, is a fruit of the Spirit that we all need.  Me more than most, probably, but we all must cultivate this along with all the others.  I already discussed self-control and I didn’t mention this, but that fruit is not very hard for me.  Gentleness is.  Any of the fruit that have any relation to compassion or care are foreign to who I used to be.

What is gentleness or meekness?  This is from Dictionary.com:

Gentleness…The quality or state of being gentle, well-born, mild, benevolent, docile, etc.; gentility; softness of manners, disposition, etc.; mildness.

Meekness…A calm temper of mind, not easily provoked; a disposition to be patient and long suffering.

We get the sense from these definitions and the biblical narrative that this fruit, gentleness or meekness, implies a calm disposition, particularly under fire–which actually requires a great deal of strength. Jesus Christ is the perfect example of a bearer of this fruit.  He exemplifies the biblical description of a calm disposition, particularly under fire.  I like to say meekness as meant here, is having “strength, under control.”

Jesus said that the meek would inherit the world.  And the world today has come to misuse this word and define it as something Jesus did not mean.  The world would have us think that “meek means weak” and that is just not true. At any time during Christ’s abuse, torture, and crucifixion, or any of the other times He suffered, He could have called on the Host of Heaven or even His own disengaged power, and wiped all who came against Him out.  But He didn’t.  He was meek; He was gentle, in all His dealings save one, with those He encountered.  And even in the temple, He could have done so much more.

Jesus said, “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth” (Matthew 5:5).    The world says, “Blessed are the strong, those who can hold their own.”  The world favors more conspicuous and so-called heroic virtues. The strongly competitive, aggressive and assertive are the ones who receive recognition, admiration and reward. They seem to end up on top of the heap, possessing the most and the best, despite their obvious and offensive character flaws.

As we know, these types of achievements, these accolades from a fallen world, have nothing to do with eternal reward except to waste the time we have for the storing of this treasure.

When we hold our temper in check, or better yet when it starts to disappear, we are displaying fruit.  When we could strike back, but don’t, we are displaying fruit.  When our attitude and character invite instead of intimidate, we are displaying fruit.

When a little girl named Kaci can sit and try to play with someone that used to be described as a bear and was called Sarge, it must be another evidence of this fruit called gentleness or meekness.

Thank God for His gracious power to change us all.  I want to be one of the meek who inherit.  Don’t you?

Love you all

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

11
Sep

Just thinking.

   Posted by: Sonny    in Politics, Self

I do not really want to write a lot of political commentary on this blog.  But a thought came to mind that I just have to get out of me. 

 

The liberal Democrat will let you know in many wonderful words and beautiful sentiments how much they care for everyone.  And at the same time, if they are in politics or entertainment, they simply do not conceal their attitudes of superiority and arrogance. 

 

The conservative Republican, on the other hand, does not usually portray any concern for the common man.  But their actions sometimes do show they care a little bit.  But they are much better at hiding their condescending thoughts about us.

 

The thing that seems obvious about both sides is simply that they care mostly only about themselves and will say anything to promote what they care the most about.  I am talking about those on both sides that are in the limelight.  The prominent, important people in our world.

 

But my real question is, are we any better?

 

 Rom 3:10  … “THERE IS NONE RIGHTEOUS, NOT EVEN ONE;

 

Evidently not

 

Love you all

   

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Page 1 of 11